Book a 30 minute call
Multi-entity groups

When the group has four entities, somebody has to hold the whole picture

A Singapore holding company, a Thai operating company, a Vietnamese factory and a Hong Kong invoicing entity. Four accountants, four auditors, four statutory calendars, four sets of books on four different standards. Everyone is doing their job. Nobody owns the number the board actually needs.

What we hold
Entities
Typically 3 to 10
Currencies
Consolidated and translated
Standards
Local GAAP bridged to
IFRS or group basis
Calendar
One close date,
every entity
Core jurisdictions
Thailand, Singapore, Hong Kong,
Vietnam, Indonesia
Wider region
14 APAC markets
run first hand
You get
One consolidated view
Groups and subsidiaries we work with Vero, El Mercado, Tomorrowland, Factorytalk PropertyScout, Gree Energy, Andovar, C.C.S. Group, MAQE, Ambient, Manuport Logistics, Alodokter
The failure mode

Where group numbers break

Not one big failure. Seven small ones that compound quietly and all surface at the same moment, usually during a funding round or a sale.

  • The consolidation lives in one person's spreadsheet

    Multi-entity, multi-currency consolidation built by one finance manager in Excel is the most common single point of failure we find in Asian groups. It works until that person leaves, or until somebody asks to see the workings.

  • Intercompany never agrees

    Entity A says it is owed, entity B has never booked it, and the difference has been carried as a plug for three years. Every month it grows, and nobody has time to unpick it because the close is already late.

  • Local books and group books drift apart

    Thai statutory accounts are prepared for the Revenue Department. Vietnamese books follow VAS because they must. Singapore reports on SFRS. Head office wants IFRS. After two years nobody can bridge them, and the bridge is the first thing an acquirer asks for.

  • Foreign exchange is translated, not managed

    Translation differences get posted wherever they balance. Real transactional exposure across baht, dong, Singapore and Hong Kong dollars goes unmeasured, so it is either unhedged or hedged on instinct.

  • Nobody owns the statutory calendar across jurisdictions

    Each country has its own deadlines, its own audit rules and its own filing dates. Each local provider tracks their own. No one holds the combined view, so the group learns about a missed obligation from a penalty notice.

  • Cash is trapped and invisible

    The group is cash rich in one country and borrowing in another. Dividend restrictions, thin capitalisation, withholding on intercompany interest and capital contribution rules all bear on this, and none of it is modelled.

  • Transfer pricing is written afterwards

    Management fees and cost recharges are booked all year and documented in a hurry at year end. Written retrospectively, the documentation reads exactly like it was written retrospectively.

The engagement

What a group CFO engagement actually delivers

  • One auditable consolidation

    Rebuilt out of the spreadsheet into something with a documented method, proper intercompany elimination, a defensible translation approach and workings a third party can follow.

  • A common reporting framework

    One chart of accounts, one close date, one revenue recognition basis, one submission package that every entity completes. This is the unglamorous work that everything else depends on.

  • Maintained local to group bridges

    A documented monthly reconciliation from each entity's statutory basis to the group basis. Run monthly it is routine. Run once a year under audit pressure it is a crisis.

  • Intercompany discipline

    Agreed balances every month, a settlement rhythm, priced and papered service agreements, and a transfer pricing position documented while the evidence still exists.

  • One statutory calendar

    Every filing, audit, AGM and licence condition in every jurisdiction, with an owner and a date, held centrally rather than distributed across four providers who each assume someone else is watching.

  • A group cash view

    Where the cash is, what it costs to move it, what is genuinely available and what is trapped. Then facilities negotiated on your numbers rather than the bank's assumptions.

  • Diligence readiness held continuously

    A buyer or investor reads the structure, the books and the contracts together, often for the first time in the group's history. Keeping those three consistent all year is far cheaper than reconciling them in a data room.

Evidence

Groups we are running right now

  • Seven APAC entities, freight forwarding

    Regional CFO APAC at Manuport Logistics across Singapore, Indonesia, Korea, Japan, Thailand, Hong Kong and the Philippines. Re-establishing visibility over local accounting, audits, statutory filings and external providers, and running the monthly close with balance sheet reconciliations, accruals and intercompany matching, reporting into Antwerp.

  • Four entities, proptech

    Group CFO at PropertyScout, rebuilding the close and the consolidated profit and loss, balance sheet and cash flow model for the board. Owned the Singapore FY2025 statutory accounts and AGM, drove the Thai audit, and fixed commission accrual and margin issues across roughly 600 agents.

  • Fourteen markets, 72 finance staff

    Regional CFO Asia at Scan Global Logistics from 2020 to 2025. M&A, greenfield entry and integration across Bangladesh, Hong Kong, Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos and Sri Lanka, with ERP and TMS rollouts and a shared services implementation behind it.

  • A European parent with a Thai subsidiary

    Head of Finance at Tomorrowland Thailand, from entity setup to event delivery on a budget above EUR 40 million across 11 departments, acting as the bridge between Thai regulatory requirements and group headquarters in Belgium.

The pattern
  • Multiple entities
  • Multiple standards
  • One accountable CFO
New markets

Opening an entity somewhere you have never operated

Setting up a subsidiary is the part of regional expansion that looks administrative and is not. The decisions taken in the first month, on structure, capital, chart of accounts and who signs, are the ones that are expensive to unpick three years later.

  • Structure before incorporation

    What the entity is for determines what it should be. A trading company, a service company, a representative office and a BOI-promoted company have different tax, ownership and reporting consequences, and the wrong choice is corrected by liquidating and starting again.

  • A chart of accounts that maps to the group on day one

    The cheapest moment to align a new entity with your group reporting standard is before it has posted a single transaction. Almost nobody does it then, and the reconciliation debt compounds from the first month.

  • Capital, funding and the money getting in

    Charter capital requirements, contribution deadlines, registration of offshore loans, and the practical question of which bank will actually open the account and how long it takes. This is where most timelines slip.

  • Finance staffed and supervised from the start

    Recruiting the local finance manager, setting the close calendar, and having someone senior review the first three months of output. A new entity left to find its own habits will keep them.

  • The statutory calendar from month one

    Registration triggers obligations immediately, including in jurisdictions where you have not yet traded. Late first filings are a poor way to introduce yourself to a tax authority.

Between them, the partners have run greenfield entries and new market openings across Bangladesh, Hong Kong, Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos, Sri Lanka and Kenya, and set up subsidiary finance functions from nothing in several more. Company formation and licensing in Thailand runs through our sister firms, Plizz and Narai Partners.

Shapes we see most

Three group structures, one underlying problem

Holdco and opcos

A Singapore or Hong Kong holding company over operating entities in Thailand, Vietnam or Indonesia. The holdco carries the investor relationship and the group numbers, but the substance and the difficulty sit downstream.

Singapore holding companies

European parent, Asian subsidiaries

Head office cannot see what is happening, does not trust the numbers coming back, and has no one on the ground who speaks both the local language and the group's reporting standard. This is the most common brief we take.

How that works in practice

Investor-backed portfolio company

Post-investment, the reporting obligations step up sharply and the finance function that got the company this far cannot carry them. A fractional group CFO is faster and cheaper than the wrong permanent hire.

Engagement models
Honest answers

Coverage, and what we do not claim

Do you have offices in every country you cover?

No, and we would not trust a practice our size that claimed to. We are based in Bangkok with a Hong Kong legal entity for regional contracting. What we bring is the layer that is genuinely missing in most Asian groups: one senior person who understands all of the entities at once and is accountable for the consolidated number. Your local accountants, auditors and tax agents stay where they are. We lead them.

How do you work with our existing local providers?

We set the standard and the calendar, they keep doing the work. In practice that means an agreed close date per entity, a defined reporting package each of them submits, and one person chasing and reviewing rather than the owner relaying messages between four firms. Most local providers welcome it, because for the first time somebody is telling them precisely what is needed and when.

We do not really have a group reporting standard. Is that a problem?

It is extremely common and it is the first thing we fix. Until every entity reports on the same chart of accounts, the same close date and the same revenue recognition basis, a consolidation is arithmetic performed on incompatible inputs. Building that framework is usually four to eight weeks of work and it is what everything else depends on.

Which countries can you actually cover?

We hold statutory depth in Thailand, Singapore, Hong Kong, Vietnam and Indonesia, and we have run finance across 14 APAC markets including Korea, Japan, the Philippines, Malaysia, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos and Sri Lanka. For a market outside our five core jurisdictions we are explicit about it: we hold the group view and the reporting discipline, and we rely on your local adviser or one of ours for the statutory detail. We would rather say that than pretend otherwise.

Is this different from hiring a group financial controller?

A controller consolidates. What most groups are missing is someone who can consolidate and then tell the board what the consolidated numbers mean, defend them to a lender or an acquirer, and decide what to do about them. If a controller is genuinely what you need, we will say so, and we will help you hire one.